| Companies' & Schemes' Management Systems |
|
|
ObjectiveThis fourth step looks at how companies and schemes can understand, share or even align each other's best practices in their individual management systems.
Several areas are considered, such as system’s structure, codes of conduct, databases, existing tools and relationship with/recognition of other schemes. Within these areas, a number of criteria have been identified to allow mapping how the various systems are structured, which areas they cover and how they operate. This is an area where diversity can be accommodated without compromising other parts of the convergence project. The key objective here is to build greater understanding, transparency and trust, allowing these various bodies to work together. The Expert Working Group on Companies' and Schemes' Management Systems was launched in November 2009, and is constituted of the following members:
Development processDraftingThe Expert Working Group has completed work on the definition of the key review criteria, allowing the execution of a gap analysis which was used as starting point to build the draft reference requirements on buying companies’ and schemes' management systems. During development fo the tool it was acknowledged that buying companies' and schemes' management systems each contained sufficient specificities to warrant for the drafting of two separate tools. The EWG therefore first concentrated its efforts on buying companies' management systems (Supply Chain Social Performance Management Systems). This tool was adapted for schemes for the purpose of the Equivalence Process, and intergrated therein as a questionnaire. ConsultationThe first tool, the draft reference tool on SC Social Performance Management Systems, was opened to public consultation on the GSCP website in August 2010, with the consultation running through to end September 2010. This consultation generated a record participation with over 400 comments received. The Expert Working Group has reviewed and analysed all these comments, and integrated them in the draft reference tool as relevant.
ReviewAdvisory Board's input Timeline SummaryReference tool for Supply Chain Social Performance Management Systems
|


